Skip to content

Legal Implications: DOJ’s Response to the Surge in COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuits

  • by
Legal Implications: DOJ's Response to the Surge in COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuits

COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuits : The Department of Justice (DOJ) is gearing up for a legal showdown, evident in its recent job posting seeking eight attorneys to tackle vaccine injury cases on behalf of the federal government. This move anticipates an influx of lawsuits stemming from COVID-19 vaccine mandates, where individuals, compelled by government directives, experienced severe side effects and are now seeking compensation within a system seemingly stacked against them. More Information

DOJ’s Response to the Surge in COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuits

DOJ’s Expansion: A Response to Increased Vaccine Lawsuits

In a recent job ad on the USAJobs website, the Torts Branch of the DOJ revealed its plan to hire additional attorneys to address the growing workload related to cases filed under the Vaccine Act. This expansion is a clear signal that the DOJ foresees a surge in legal actions arising from the mandatory COVID vaccinations.

Legal Challenges: Overturning Pharmaceutical Immunity

Advertisement

This hiring spree follows a relatively unnoticed lawsuit filed in Louisiana last month by six individuals who suffered vaccine-related injuries. The lawsuit’s primary goal is to challenge the legal immunity enjoyed by pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer and Moderna concerning their COVID vaccines.

While the expectation isn’t necessarily that Big Pharma will immediately pay up, a successful outcome could prompt Congress to reevaluate outdated vaccine injury compensation systems established nearly four decades ago.

Lingering Uncertainty for Claimants

Approximately 13,000 Americans have claimed adverse reactions to the COVID vaccine, ranging from life-threatening conditions like myocarditis to immune disorders like Guillain-Barre syndrome. However, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), responsible for overseeing claims related to vaccines administered under emergency measures, has faced significant criticism.

The CICP Challenge: A “Kangaroo Court”

A lawsuit filed by attorney Aaron Siri describes the CICP as a “kangaroo court,” where claims are often lost, ignored, denied, or trapped in bureaucratic purgatory for years.

The compensation, if granted, is neither timely nor adequate. By October of this year, only six people had been compensated out of over 12,775 COVID injury claims submitted since January 2020, leaving many claimants in limbo.

Tragic Cases Highlighting Vaccine Injuries

Advertisement

The Louisiana lawsuit includes heartbreaking stories, such as that of Emma Burkey, an 18-year-old who suffered a devastating brain injury after receiving the Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine. Another case involves Ernest Ramirez Jr., a healthy 16-year-old athlete who died of a heart attack days after getting his first Pfizer dose.

Legal Challenges Amplify Public Distrust

Despite more than 650 million COVID vaccine doses administered in the US, cases like Burkey’s and Ramirez Jr.’s highlight the tragic side effects that, while rare, contribute to public distrust. Victims and their families face not only physical and emotional challenges but also censorship on social media and demonization as “anti-vaxxers.”

Legal Implications: DOJ's Response to the Surge in COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuits

A Broader Impact on Public Health Trust

Attorney Siri dismisses the characterization of his clients as “anti-vaxxers,” emphasizing the economic forces at play. The immunity granted to Big Pharma disrupts normal market forces that ensure product safety, contributing to vaccine hesitancy.

With disinformation surrounding masks, lockdowns, and the COVID jab, the federal government’s credibility and public trust face a significant downturn.

Conclusion :

The DOJ’s proactive hiring approach signifies a looming legal battle over COVID-19 vaccine mandates and injuries. As legal challenges unfold, the broader impact on public health trust and the need for comprehensive vaccine injury compensation reforms become increasingly apparent.

Disclaimer:

Advertisement

The information provided in this content is for general informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and timeliness, the content may not be exhaustive or up-to-date.

This content does not constitute professional advice or substitute for consultation with qualified professionals. Readers are encouraged to seek professional guidance regarding their specific circumstances.

The opinions expressed in this content are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or entity mentioned. The author and the platform make no representations or warranties about the completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained herein.

Any action taken based on the information in this content is at the reader’s own risk. The author and the platform shall not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages arising from the use of or reliance on the information provided.

This disclaimer is subject to change without notice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *